So, as Charlie so eloquently wrote about, a few days ago Tori donned her swimsuit cover up (a terry cloth striped dress thing) and twirled around and announced, "I'm a princess!"
We were horrified.
I have no idea where she got the notion of princess from. It's not that I'm anti-princess--well, OK. I am anti-princess. I do not want Tori to ever buy into the notion that she just needs to sit back and some MAN will come and rescue her from something. I hate that idea. My mom fought hard to keep that notion from settling with me (and I think she succeeded). I don't want Tori to descend into the whole princess ideal, so she doesn't see TV shows or movies that involve princesses and we don't read any books that involve princesses. When she's older and we can discuss the concepts and shortcomings of princesses we'll go ahead, and then maybe I'll introduce her to the super cool princesses that occur in my fantasy novels--women that are smart, strong leaders that can also kick ASS.
I find myself more and more strongly about protecting and nurturing the strong, smart, curious and athletic child that I see Tori becoming, and that makes me want to keep things from her that will tell her that she's a girl, and that because she's a girl a whole lot of people believe that she shouldn't do many of the things she loves.
Some will think I'm paranoid (and some will think I am judging them harshly because they love their princesses and love sharing them with their daughters, but I am not--this is for me, and my daughter only), but I'm a daughter of a feminist and a feminist myself, so I find sexism and enforced gender roles easy to spot among all the marketing that's done to children. I mean, every big box store has one or two toy aisles dedicated to girls and everything is PINK. Tori likes some pink things; but she also likes trains, and cars, and building things--items you will not find in the girl's toy section of a store--as well as the occasional tiara or fancy dress. I want Tori to feel comfortable embracing ALL aspects of her personality and her preferences.
I'm not sure why I would think we've come farther than this by now. It's clear we have not; just the other day an article about BlogHer--a conference featuring over 1,000 powerhouse women that sponsors were falling all over themselves trying to impress--was put in the Fashion & Style section of the New York Times. Worse, the conference was described in such condescending tones I wanted to scream (quote: " a corporate-sponsored Oprah-inflected version of a ’60s consciousness-raising group." Seriously? It wasn't even REMOTELY like that, but because there was a "lactation room" it's a hippy Oprah event. AAARRRRRGGGGGGG!). In case you are wondering, conferences that feature male bloggers? End up in either the business or technology section.
Gender roles are still being enforced all around us, every day. I want so much to protect my daughter from them, so she can grow to be comfortable in her own skin. Because if I've learned anything these 40 years I've been alive, it's that enforced roles cause nothing but self-hatred.
It was with this attitude in mind that I listened to a story on NPR about transgendered children not too long ago. The story features two different families with boys that they feel were identifying with "girl" toys rather than traditional boys toys. Now, it may well be that these children are truly transgendered--but that determination sprung from the idea that the children were playing with the "wrong" toys.
The two families featured in the NPR story take two different roads with their kids. One family sees a therapist that tries to force the child to identify only with his born gender; the other family allows their son to call himself a girl, grow his hair long, and wear girl's clothing--even at school. If Tori were like these kids, I would assuredly go along the route that the second family took--I would allow Tori to be whoever she wanted to be, even if that meant she identified as male (although I would probably not be comfortable with the relatively new practice of hormone suppression in children to prevent them from entering puberty until they are old enough to make a specific choice about gender; I wish I could find a link explaining this but I cannot. Basically, hormones are given so that the children do not develop secondary sex characteristics, such as an Adam's apples or wide hips and breasts. This way, if the child decides to have gender reassignment surgery, they appear more "natural" as their gender choice as adults). But I would only do that because I just don't believe that there are any appearances, behaviors, or attitudes that are gender specific.
I'll say that again; I do not believe that there are any specific behaviors, ways of dressing, or attitudes that are specifically male or female. I believe, quite firmly, that I would love my eyeliner as much as I do whether I was male or female. I also love fixing things and building things, regardless of my gender. And even though I am technically female, I still hate asking for directions when I'm lost and, oddly, Charlie--who is most assuredly male--doesn't mind asking for directions at all.
I often find myself wondering if we were less gender-focused with children as young as Tori, would there be fewer folks that identify as transgendered? If boys were allowed to just wear dresses sometimes, and girls were allowed to play with dump trucks, would those kids as adults feel so constricted by gender identity that they would undergo a fairly brutal series of surgeries to change that?
I don't know much about this, so I asked my friend Jon. When I met Jon, he identified as a woman--a butch lesbian, but a woman. Jon now identifies as masculine, pansexual, intersexed, guy (he explains that a bit here). This is what he has to say:
To me, transsexualism is about the body. Transgender is about gender
role. If the body is fine, but the imposed role is wrong, then it's
about the role... the gender assignment. The fact that people think
that in order to be a woman, a person has to have certain parts, is
pretty twisted... and, I think, a mentality which affects people in
very negative ways. There's no reason that a woman should feel less of
a woman if she loses a breast to cancer. There's no reason that a small
penis should make a man feel less of a man. I think that people not
being taught to separate sex from gender is something which does
nothing but cause pain. To me, that surgery is recommended to men who
enjoy lingerie, long hair, and getting their nails done is simply
brutal... and it is sexist. Pink may be a feminine thing, but it is not a female thing.
I also really like what Jon said about the hormone suppression of transgendered children in one of our emails:
Aside from the fact that the "sex" hormones are responsible for more
than just the "secondary sex characteristics" and so are needed as a
person is growing, it would mean that the stereotyping and polarizing
of both sex and gender would be supported, and I don't think that's the
way to go. What is a woman supposed to look like? What is a man supposed to look like? Is it not more important to further educate people and to
grow as a culture/society by supporting the truth, which is that sex,
gender, and sexuality are all just stereotypes? That it's all a
continuum?
I couldn't agree more with the last statement: that sex, gender, and sexuality are all on a continuum: some folks are attracted to just men, some both men and women, some just women. Some people identify with female gender stereotypes, some with male and female gender stereotypes, and some just male gender stereotypes. And, honestly, I think there are few of us that completely end up at either end of the spectrum.
I am very interested in what you think, but I think this could very easily be a place where the comments get ugly, so let's practice some basic kindness. Talk about your opinions only, without condemning others that disagree with you--OK?